dont-call-me-a-faerie:

no, i’m equally confused… like pan was started for those that bi didn’t fit… cuz I too am attracted to the whole spectrum and not just f or m…. and I’m just ??????????? how anyone saying there pan, which in under the bi umbrella anyway, would make bi ppl invisible… like what?????

((See, the only thing I can think of is because they’re genderfluid and that has something to do with it? But I honest to fuck have no clue. Like, per their own definition, imo no matter what they identify with at the moment, they still only see attraction to Option A or Option B. I can potentially be attracted to Options A-Z??? and I have no idea how that discredits them and erases their sexuality???))

{{ *hugs* if you did, than I did too. But I’m a nonbinary/gender fluid mess myself which is why (though I often say bi for simplicity) pan is the only thing that makes sense? Like… gender binary is beyond stupid and shouldn’t even be a spectrum? It needs at least 2 axis. But whatever. All I know is that, yeah, pan is and should be a lagit thing so you are okay. We can be confused and pan here with all the rest of the lovely and understanding people. }}

Leave a comment